Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:03
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sleep’s Secret Sequence May Sculpt Our Memories Like a Garden - Neuroscience News
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why Sonics expansion talk could heat up this summer - The Seattle Times
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
China-US Deal Didn’t Address Some Rare Earths Controls: Reuters - Bloomberg.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Do you as a gay male enjoy the feeling of getting a penis in your anus?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Kuorans, what are some things unique to your country?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.